• Reset your password

Main navigation

  • Home
  • About
    • Methodology
    • A Brief History of PRE
    • Funding and Support
  • Evaluations
  • Plants
  • Organizations
  • Community
  • Projects

User account menu

  • Log in
PRE — Plant Risk Evaluator

Ulmus pumila -- Washington

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Issues

Evaluation Summary


photo by Wikipedia

Evaluation Date:  2022-08-15

Screener:  Jim Evans
 
Plant:  Ulmus pumila
Common Name(s):
Siberian Elm

State:  Washington

PRE Score:  16
Questions Answered:  20
Screener Confidence (%):  80

Executive Summary

Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila) is a fast-growing deciduous tree to 70 feet tall, native to northern China, Korea, Mongolia, and Eastern Siberia. The species tolerates partial shade but is primarily sun-loving. U. pumila favors well-drained soils and is noted for its ability to tolerate droughty conditions, but can also tolerate seasonally moist soils. U. pumila reproduces primarily via the production of winged seeds that are adapted for wind dispersal and are also capable of long-distance dispersal via water.

U. pumila was once widely planted in the U. S. because of its rapid growth and tolerance of cold and dry environments. It has escaped cultivation to colonize abandoned fields and other anthropogenically disturbed sites, prairies, and naturally disturbed sites such as riparian areas and floodplains. Ulmus pumila occurs as naturalized individuals and small populations on both sides of the Cascade Mountains in Washington and Oregon and appears well-adapted to expand its presence in the Pacific Northwest, especially in riparian areas.

Climate Matching Map

Attachment Size
ClimateMatch_WA_Ulmus_pumila.pdf (1.18 MB) 1.18 MB

1. Question 1

Yes
1
High
Native to northern China, Korea, Mongolia, and Eastern Siberia, Ulmus pumila is naturalized across in nearly every state in the U.S., and in nearly every province across the southern tier of Canada.
“Ulmus Pumila L”. n.d. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://plants.usda.gov/home/plantProfile?symbol=ulpu.

2. Question 2

Yes
2
High
PlantRight Climate Matching results indicate that U. pumila is naturalized in a similar climate in much of the western U.S., in scattered locations in the Appalachian Mountains, in central and eastern Europe, and in Russia near the northern end of the Caspian Sea. More than 30 naturalized occurrences of U. pumila have been documented in Washington and Oregon, from individual trees to small populations, on both sides of the Cascade Mountains.
“WTU Herbarium Database”. 2021. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. https://www.burkemuseum.org/collections-and-research/biology/plants-and-fungi/collections-database/.
“PlantRight”. n.d. http://websites.greeninfo.org/plantright/finder/$\#$.

3. Question 3

Yes
2
Very High
U. pumila is widely reported as invasive in North America, including in Indiana (Jacquart et al. 2007), Iowa (Farrar 2001), and western states (Perry et al. 2018, Reynolds et al. 2022). The species is listed as a Class C noxious weed in New Mexico (Beck and Wanstall 2020).
Jacquart, E, P O’Connor, K Collins, D Gorden, J Kiefer, and K Howe. 2007. “Assessment of Invasive Species in Indiana\textquoterights Natural Areas: Siberian Elm (Ulmus Pumila)”. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 9 pp. https://www.in.gov/dnr/files/Official_Siberian_Elm_Assessment.pdf.
Reynolds, L, L Perry, P Shafroth, G Katz, and A Norton. 2022. “Invasion of Siberian Elm (Ulmus Pumila) Along the South Platte River: The Roles of Seed Source, Human Influence, and River Geomorphology”. Wetlands 42: Article 10.
Farrar, D. 2001. “Exotic and Invasive Woody Plant Species in Iowa”. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 108: 154-57. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130\&context=jias.
Perry, L, L Reynolds, and P Shafroth. 2018. “Divergent Effects of Land-Use, Propagule Pressure, and Climate on Woody Riparian Invasion”. Biological Invasions 20: 3271-95.
Beck, L, and J Wanstall. (2020) 2020. “Noxious and Troublesome Weeds of New Mexico” 2022. Las Cruces, NM: College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences. New Mexico State University. https://pubs.nmsu.edu/_circulars/CR698/$\#$.

4. Question 4

Yes
3
Very High
U. pumila is invasive in Colorado, especially in riparian areas (Perry et al. 2018, Reynolds et al. 2022), and in northern New Mexico, a state where where it is a Class C Noxious Weed (Beck and Wanstall).
Reynolds, L, L Perry, P Shafroth, G Katz, and A Norton. 2022. “Invasion of Siberian Elm (Ulmus Pumila) Along the South Platte River: The Roles of Seed Source, Human Influence, and River Geomorphology”. Wetlands 42: Article 10.
Perry, L, L Reynolds, and P Shafroth. 2018. “Divergent Effects of Land-Use, Propagule Pressure, and Climate on Woody Riparian Invasion”. Biological Invasions 20: 3271-95.
Beck, L, and J Wanstall. (2020) 2020. “Noxious and Troublesome Weeds of New Mexico” 2022. Las Cruces, NM: College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences. New Mexico State University. https://pubs.nmsu.edu/_circulars/CR698/$\#$.

5. Question 5

No
0
Medium
Chinese elm (U. parvifolia) is considered an invasive species by some accounts but, in both its native and introduced ranges, is distributed almost exclusively in climates dissimilar to the Pacific Northwest.
“Chinese Elm, Ulmus Parvifolia Jacq”. 2018. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. https://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/subject.html?sub=6567.
“Climate Matching Map for Ulmus Parvifolia”. 2022. https://weedmap.cal-ipc.org/climatematch/?areaType=states\&areaList=53\&mapView=2\%2C-176.13281\%2C8.75479\&datalayer=PRE+Combined\&datalayeropacity=60\&gbif_taxonkey=5361869\&gbif_search=Ulmus+parvifolia.

6. Question 6

No
0
High
PlantRight Climate Matching results show most of Ulmus pumila’s worldwide distribution is mostly outside of climates similar to the Pacific Northwest. In the Western Hemisphere U. pumila is distributed primarily through the Midwest and southern tier of the U.S., while in the Eastern Hemisphere its distribution is primarily in the southern Iberian Peninsula, and in Eastern Europe and western Russia.
“PlantRight”. n.d. http://websites.greeninfo.org/plantright/finder/$\#$.

7. Question 7

Yes
1
Very High
U. pumila is a significant invader of riparian areas in the western and midwestern U.S., where it competes with native cottonwood and willow species and preempts sites important to those species’ establishment (Perry et al. 2018, Reynolds et al. 2022, Farrar 2001). The species also invades upland sites such as old fields, disturbed natural areas (Jacquart et al. 2007).
Jacquart, E, P O’Connor, K Collins, D Gorden, J Kiefer, and K Howe. 2007. “Assessment of Invasive Species in Indiana\textquoterights Natural Areas: Siberian Elm (Ulmus Pumila)”. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 9 pp. https://www.in.gov/dnr/files/Official_Siberian_Elm_Assessment.pdf.
Reynolds, L, L Perry, P Shafroth, G Katz, and A Norton. 2022. “Invasion of Siberian Elm (Ulmus Pumila) Along the South Platte River: The Roles of Seed Source, Human Influence, and River Geomorphology”. Wetlands 42: Article 10.
Perry, L, L Reynolds, and P Shafroth. 2018. “Divergent Effects of Land-Use, Propagule Pressure, and Climate on Woody Riparian Invasion”. Biological Invasions 20: 3271-95.
Farrar, Donald R. 2001. “Exotic and Invasive Woody Plant Species in Iowa”. The Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 108: 154\textendash157. http://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias/vol108/iss4/.

8. Question 8

No
0
Low
None of the available literature suggested any influence of U. pumila on fire regimes.
No references cited.

9. Question 9

Yes
1
Medium
The Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States (2018) states that U. pumila “forms dense thickets that close open areas ……. thereby reducing forage for wild animals and livestock."
States, Invasive Plant Atlas of the United. (2018) 2018. “Siberian Elm, Ulmus Pumila L”. 2022. Athens, GA: Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, University of Georgia. https://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/subject.html?sub=3479.

10. Question 10

Yes
1
Medium
The Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States (2018) states that U. pumila “forms dense thickets that close open areas ……. thereby reducing forage for wild animals and livestock."
States, Invasive Plant Atlas of the United. (2018) 2018. “Siberian Elm, Ulmus Pumila L”. 2022. Athens, GA: Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, University of Georgia. https://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/subject.html?sub=3479.

11. Question 11

No
0
Very High
U. pumila will resprout from the roots following damage to or cutting of the main stem, but this is not a significant mechanism of spread (Wesche et al. 2011).
Wesche, K, D Walther, H von Wehrden, and I Hensen. 2011. “Trees in the Desert: Reproduction and Genetic Structure of Fragmented Ulmus Pumila Forests in Mongolian Drylands”. Flora 206: 91-99.

12. Question 12

No
0
High
Multiple sources cite reproduction by seed as U. pumila’s mechanism of reproduction, None of these sources mention fragmentation as a significant mechanism.
Barbour, J, and K Brinkman. 2005. “Ulmus L”. In , Agriculture Handbook 727:1143-49. Washington, DC: USDA U.S. Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_series/wo/wo_ah727.pdf.
Wesche, K, D Walther, H von Wehrden, and I Hensen. 2011. “Trees in the Desert: Reproduction and Genetic Structure of Fragmented Ulmus Pumila Forests in Mongolian Drylands”. Flora 206: 91-99.
Blass, C, K Ronnenberg, O Tackenberg, I Hensen, and K Wesche. 2010. “The Relative Importance of Different Seed Dispersal Modes in Dry Mongolian Rangelands”. Journal of Arid Environments 74: 991\textendash997.

13. Question 13

Yes
1
Very High
Laboratory studies report 74-89% germination in seeds of U. pumila report germination in laboratory/ greenhouse studies as 81%.
No references cited.

14. Question 14

Yes
1
Medium
Jacquart et al. (2007) state that “[e]ven small trees can have >1,000 seeds.” This seems reasonable for mature trees, but the references provided by the authors either don’t support this assertion quantitatively or could not be found. Thus confidence for this answer can only be Medium.
Jacquart, E, P O’Connor, K Collins, D Gorden, J Kiefer, and K Howe. 2007. “Assessment of Invasive Species in Indiana\textquoterights Natural Areas: Siberian Elm (Ulmus Pumila)”. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 9 pp. https://www.in.gov/dnr/files/Official_Siberian_Elm_Assessment.pdf.

15. Question 15

Yes
1
Very High
Wesche et al. (2011) reported germination rates of 48-74% (depending on substrate type) for U. pumila in field tests within the species native range in Mongolia. Given the high germination rates reported from laboratory studies (74-89 %; Hirsch et al. 2012, Song et al. 2011) it seems reasonable to infer that > 25% of seeds would germinate in the wild given appropriate substrate, temperature, and moisture habitats within the species’ naturalized range.
No references cited.

16. Question 16

No
0
High
Barbour and Brinkman (2008) report the minimum seed-bearing age of U. pumila as eight years.
Barbour, J, and K Brinkman. 2005. “Ulmus L”. In , Agriculture Handbook 727:1143-49. Washington, DC: USDA U.S. Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_series/wo/wo_ah727.pdf.

17. Question 17

No
0
High
Barbour and Brinkman (2008) report the flowering period of U. pumila as March-April, and the fruiting period as only two months, April-May. The Jepson eflora reports the flowering period for the species in California as March-April, supporting this data (Whittemore 2012).
Barbour, J, and K Brinkman. 2005. “Ulmus L”. In , Agriculture Handbook 727:1143-49. Washington, DC: USDA U.S. Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_series/wo/wo_ah727.pdf.
Whittemore, A. 2012. “Ulmus Pumila” 2022. Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora. https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=47484.

18. Question 18

No
0
High
U. pumila’s winged seeds are adapted for wind dispersal and may also be water-dispersed. Blass et al. (2010) found no evidence of animal dispersal in field tests in Mongolia.
Blass, C, K Ronnenberg, O Tackenberg, I Hensen, and K Wesche. 2010. “The Relative Importance of Different Seed Dispersal Modes in Dry Mongolian Rangelands”. Journal of Arid Environments 74: 991\textendash997.

19. Question 19

Yes
1
Very High
Field studies by Blass et al. (2010) found windborne dispersal of U. pumila seeds exceeded 100 m. The authors also found that 99% of U. pumila seeds remained afloat in water for 24 hours, suggesting a capacity for long-distance water-borne dispersal.
Blass, C, K Ronnenberg, O Tackenberg, I Hensen, and K Wesche. 2010. “The Relative Importance of Different Seed Dispersal Modes in Dry Mongolian Rangelands”. Journal of Arid Environments 74: 991\textendash997.

20. Question 20

Yes
1
Medium
The U.S. Forest Service’s ‘Field Guide for Managing Siberian Elm in the Southwest’ (2014) states that "[s]eed may be carried long distances by adhering to surfaces and undercarriages of logging equipment and vehicles." Vehicular transport of seeds is a widely recognized phenomenon; U. pumila’s wind-dispersed seeds could be expected to be distributed to any number of locations where the tiny seeds in their papery samaras may adhere to muddy tire treads, frames or fenders.
“Field Guide for Managing Siberian Elm in the Southwest”. 2014. USDA Forest Service, Southwest Region. https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5410128.pdf.
van Wychen, L. 2011. “Unlikely Stowaways: Weed Seeds Travel to Faraway Places on Cars, Trucks and ATVs”. Weed Science Society of America. https://ucanr.edu/blogs/UCDWeedScience/blogfiles/8999.pdf.
Barbour, J, and K Brinkman. 2005. “Ulmus L”. In , Agriculture Handbook 727:1143-49. Washington, DC: USDA U.S. Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_series/wo/wo_ah727.pdf.
“Ulmus Pumila - Plant Finder”. n.d. http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?taxonid=287397\&isprofile=1\&basic=ulmus\%20pumila.

Total PRE Score

16
20
80

PRE Score Legend

The PRE Score is calculated by adding the point totals for each (answered) question.

< 13 : Low Potential Risk
13 - 15 : Moderate Potential Risk
> 15 : High Potential Risk

Questions Answered Legend

It is important to answer at least 16 questions to consider a PRE Score as "valid".

≥ 16 : Valid (80% or more questions answered)
≤ 15 : Invalid (not enough questions answered)

Evaluation Credits and Citation


Screener:  Jim Evans

 

Below is a recommend citation when referencing this evaluation in other works:

Evans, Jim. "Ulmus pumila -- Washington" Plant Risk Evaluator (PRE) published 2022-08-15 https://pretool.org/evaluations/1784

 


Please cite this evaluation. We need your support here!

PRE Evaluations take a long time to research, so please credit this site and evaluation appropriately.


Evaluation Reviewers

Jutta Burger reviewed on 2022-09-05
Alex Simmons reviewed on 2022-09-02
reviewed on 2022-08-25

 

Associated Project

2022 Western IPM Grant Project

"Expanding Continuity and Capacity in Invasive Plant Risk Assessments across Western States" is a continuation of the successful 2021 project titled "Building Continuity Across State Invasvie Plant Lists: Evaluating Invasive Risk of Horticultural Plants." Both 2021 and 2022's projects are funded by the Western Integrated Pest Management Center. Project partners for this year inclue the California Invasive Plant Council, PlantRight, The University of Arizona, Western Invasive Species Network, Pacific Northwest Invasive Species Council, the Yurok Tribe, and Nevada State Parks. 


 

Associated Organizations, Agencies, and Institutions

Pacific Northwest Invasive Plant Council

 

Copyright © 2025 PRETool.org - All rights reserved