• Reset your password

Main navigation

  • Home
  • About
    • Methodology
    • A Brief History of PRE
    • Funding and Support
  • Evaluations
  • Plants
  • Organizations
  • Community
  • Projects

User account menu

  • Log in
PRE — Plant Risk Evaluator

Melia azedarach -- Arizona

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Issues

Evaluation Summary


photo by Forest and Kim Starr

Evaluation Date:  2022-08-30

Screener:  Michael Chamberland
 
Plant:  Melia azedarach
Common Name(s):
Chinaberry tree, Pride of India, bead-tree, Cape-lilac, White Cedar

State:  Arizona

PRE Score:  18
Questions Answered:  20
Screener Confidence (%):  70

Executive Summary

Chinaberry (Melia azedarach) is an introduced plant in warm regions around the Globe. It has a long history of use as an ornamental, and it has found application for pharmacological uses. Abundant literature on the plant and the efforts to control it support its recognition as a significant invasive species worldwide. In Arizona it has escaped cultivation less often and has not proved a major invader of wild areas. Chinaberry is rarely offered for sale in nurseries in Arizona. Trees can regularly be seen in older neighborhoods in Phoenix and Tucson suggesting the plant has the ability to persist and/or reseed in the urban environment, as the tree is not likely to be commonly planted. Chinaberry has a high PRE score rating of 18 on the basis of the considerable literature available describing its more significant impact in other parts of the world.

Climate Matching Map

Attachment Size
ClimateMatch_AZ_Melia_azedarach.pdf (1.32 MB) 1.32 MB

1. Question 1

Yes
1
Very High
Chinaberry is considered native to southeastern Asia, specifically central and western China, northern India, the Himalayan region, Burma, and Malaysia. It is also native to tropical Australia. Because chinaberry has been extensively cultivated around the world, its native distribution is uncertain. Chinaberry readily escapes cultivation and spreads to disturbed sites and wildlands. Chinaberry is a nonnative tree in North America. It occurs throughout the southern United States north to Virginia and west to central California. It also occurs in Utah, Oklahoma, Missouri and New York, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. In southern forests, its estimated cover is greatest in Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and eastern Texas. In addition to North America, chinaberry occurs as a nonnative in Mexico, Argentina, and other warm-temperature parts of the world (Waggy, 2009).

Waggy, Melissa A. 2009. “Melia Azedarach. In Fire Effects Information System”. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melaze/all.html.

2. Question 2

Yes
2
Very High
Chinaberry is naturalized in areas with a climate match to Arizona, such as Argentina, central Australia, and southern and northern Africa (GBIF, 2022).
2022. “GBIF - Melia Azedarach”. GBIF\textemdashthe Global Biodiversity Information Facility. https://www.gbif.org/species/5914287.

3. Question 3

Yes
2
High
Melia azedarach has become invasive in a number of locations in the Americas, the Pacific and Africa, and has been classified as an invasive species in some countries including South Africa and Hawaii, USA. It is difficult to control because of its ability to resprout from stems and suckers, and the expense of chemical techniques (CABI, 2022). Chinaberry displays a wide range of occurrence across warm parts of the Globe (GBIF, 2022). The significance of chinaberry invasion is shown in the prioritization it has been given in studies of biological control (Ding et al, 2006), ecological assessments (Rowntree, 1991) and listings of invasive species (Oswalt & Oswalt, 2013). Though a prioritization study gave it a lower ranking than expected for South Africa (Robertson et al, 2003).
Rojas-Sandoval, Julissa. 2022. “CABI - Invasive Species Compendium - Melia Azedarach (Chinaberry)”. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/33144$\#$tosummaryOfInvasiveness.
2022. “GBIF - Melia Azedarach”. GBIF\textemdashthe Global Biodiversity Information Facility. https://www.gbif.org/species/5914287.
Ding, Jianqing, Richard Reardon, Yun Wu, Hao Zheng, and Weidong Fu. 2006. “Biological Control of Invasive Plants through Collaboration Between China and the United States of America: A Perspective”. Biological Invasions 8: 1439-50. doi:10.1007/s10530-005-5833-2.
Rowntree, Kate. 1991. “AN ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF ALIEN INVASIVE VEGETATION ON THE GEOMORPHOLOGY OF RIVER CHANNELS IN SOUTH AFRICA”. Southern African Journal of Aquatic Sciences 17: 28-43. doi:10.1080/10183469.1991.9631311.
Oswalt, Christopher, and Sonja Oswalt. 2013. “Chapter 8: Invasive Plants on Forest Land in the United States”. In: Potter, Kevin M.; Conkling, Barbara L., Eds. 2015. Forest Health Monitoring: National Status, Trends, and Analysis 2013. General Technical Report SRS-207. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 207: 123\textendash134. http://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/58661.
Robertson, M P, M H Villet, D H K Fairbanks, L Henderson, S I Higgins, J H Hoffmann, D C Le Maitre, et al. 2003. “A Proposed Prioritization System for the Management of Invasive Alien Plants in South Africa”. South African Journal of Science, 7.

4. Question 4

Yes
3
High
Chinaberry has not been included on any state or federal Noxious Weed list. However, it is listed as an invasive species by the Texas Invasive Species Institute (2014). Its significance as invasive is supported by impacts caused by the plants' toxicity and tendency to form thickets, and ability to travel by seeds consumed by birds (Texas Invasive Species Institute, 2014). While Melia can be expected to be a more common problem in east Texas, outside the climate-matching zone, Melia is widely occurring in the Southwest, present in New Mexico, Utah, and California, other states adjacent to Arizona with large climate-matching areas. Chinaberry has been noted as common along streambanks and roadsides in semiarid savanna in the norther Cape of Africa, but its abundance declined in arid regions. Also reported from Australia (Waggy, 2009).
No references cited.

5. Question 5

No
0
Medium
Melia is a small genus with no other species with noteworthy invasive tendencies (Wikipedia, 2022). No other species in the genus Melia are listed in the Global Compendium of Weeds (Randall, 2017).
No references cited.

6. Question 6

No
0
High
Chinaberry is a widespread species which is present in areas which are a climate match to Arizona, plus many more areas. These additional areas include Central America and the Northwest portion of South America, Brazil, Central Africa, Southeast Asia and New Zealand (GBIF, 2022).
2022. “GBIF - Melia Azedarach”. GBIF\textemdashthe Global Biodiversity Information Facility. https://www.gbif.org/species/5914287.

7. Question 7

Yes
1
High
Rated as forming dense thickets, but not having a climbing or smothering habit (PIER, 2004). In Georgia, Chinaberry is ranked as a Category 1 invasive species: nonnative plants that pose serious problems in Georgia natural areas by "extensively invading native plant communities and displacing native species." In parts of Texas "often forms dense stands that reduce light to other
understory vegetation" (Waggy, 2009).
No references cited.

8. Question 8

No
0
Medium
Chinaberry sprouts from roots and stumps when damaged suggesting it may sprout after fire. Vegetative regeneration is more likely than sexual reproduction in chinaberry after fire; however, chinaberry seedlings may establish from buried seed or from off-site seed sources soon after fire. A publication from Virginia on firewise landscaping techniques gave chinaberry a low flammability rating however, no details were provided on how this determination was made. (Waggy, 2009).
Waggy, Melissa A. 2009. “Melia Azedarach. In Fire Effects Information System”. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melaze/all.html.

9. Question 9

Yes
1
High
Chinaberry is listed as toxic and unpalatable to animals (PIER, 2004). Melia azedarach intoxication has been observed in humans and domestic animals due to the ingestion of leaves or, mainly, fallen fruits, although they have a bitter taste; clinical signs in humans include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, thirst, sweating, grinding of teeth, sleepiness, and convulsions. Chinaberry poisoning has been reported in horses, cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, dogs, rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, and poultry. Toxicity of the fruits is found within the pulp, whereas the shell and kernel are quite harmless. Most poisoning occurs in autumn and winter, when the berries ripen (Ferreiro et al. 2010).
No references cited.

10. Question 10

Yes
1
Very High
Rated as forming dense thickets, but not having a climbing or smothering habit (PIER, 2004). Forming dense thickets (Tourn, 2000). In one instance, chinaberry formed impenetrable patches of vegetation in combination with pokeweed (Phytolacca sp.) and boneset (Eupatorium sp.) on an island off the coast of Texas. Can form dense stands, as has been observed in Florida and Texas (Waggy, 2009). Because this is a tree species, by inference these thickets will have capacity to block livestock and humans.
No references cited.

11. Question 11

Yes
1
High
Chinaberry typically reproduces by seeds, but may exhibit clonal growth following disturbance (e.g. fire, herbivory, animal injury).
Root buds were produced in all (fire treated and control) plagiotropic root cuts when incubated under controlled conditions. Root suckers developed from the differentiation of parenchymatous cells produced by meristematic activity in the cambial zone. Results from ongoing experiments indicate that the chances of a root sprout to survive into a new individual are much higher than those of a seedling (Tourn et al, 2000)
Tourn, G. M., M. F. Menvielle, A. L. Scopel, and B. Pidal. 2000. “Clonal Strategies of a Woody Weed: Melia Azedarach”. In , edited by A. Stokes, 137-43. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3469-1_13.

12. Question 12

No
0
Low
Chinaberry can reproduce vegetatively from root suckers. However a study of chinaberry clonal growth (Tourn, 2000) did not describe a capacity for the plant to disperse detached fragments.
Tourn, G. M., M. F. Menvielle, A. L. Scopel, and B. Pidal. 2000. “Clonal Strategies of a Woody Weed: Melia Azedarach”. In , edited by A. Stokes, 137-43. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3469-1_13.

13. Question 13

Yes
1
High
Typically reproduces by seeds (Tourn, 2000).
Tourn, G. M., M. F. Menvielle, A. L. Scopel, and B. Pidal. 2000. “Clonal Strategies of a Woody Weed: Melia Azedarach”. In , edited by A. Stokes, 137-43. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3469-1_13.

14. Question 14

No
0
Low
Rated as "no" for prolific seed production (>1000/m2) (PIER, 2004). However, described as prolific producer of seeds by CABI (2022). Each fruit contains one to six seeds (Waggy, 2009). Forms a tree suggesting high seed potential, but under dry conditions these are smaller trees where the maximum height is 10-15 m (CABI, 2022).
“Melia Azedarach: Info from PIER (PIER Species Info)”. 2004. http://hear.its.hawaii.edu/pier/species/melia_azedarach.htm.
Rojas-Sandoval, Julissa. 2022. “CABI - Invasive Species Compendium - Melia Azedarach (Chinaberry)”. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/33144$\#$tosummaryOfInvasiveness.
Waggy, Melissa A. 2009. “Melia Azedarach. In Fire Effects Information System”. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melaze/all.html.

15. Question 15

Yes
1
Medium
Seed germination of the species is very poor due to seed dormancy (Azad et al, 2010). However in a study of seed germination, the control group consisting of cleaned and dry seeds showed a 39% germination rate, while treatments such as scarification and submersion in hot water or acid yielded higher germination rates. (Azad et al, 2010).
Azad, Md. Salim, Md. Zedan-Al-Musa, and Md. Abdul Matin. 2010. “Effects of Pre-Sowing Treatments on Seed Germination of Melia Azedarach”. Journal of Forestry Research 21: 193\textendash196. doi:10.1007/s11676-010-0031-1.

16. Question 16

Yes
1
Medium
This woody species is rated as having a minimum generative time of four years (PIER, 2004). May begin flowering in the seedling stage (Waggy, 2009).
No references cited.

17. Question 17

Yes
1
Medium
Chinaberry flowers from March through April or May. Fruits and seeds are produced by July and ripen from September to October (Waggy). In Florida chinaberry flowers from March through April or May. Fruits and seeds are produced by July and ripen from September to October. In Japan, chinaberry fruits ripen autumn through winter. Fruit often remains on the tree until the leaves fall, or longer (Waggy, 2009). Noted as flowering March - July in California (Preston & McClintock, 2012).
Waggy, Melissa A. 2009. “Melia Azedarach. In Fire Effects Information System”. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melaze/all.html.
Preston, Robert E, and Elizabeth McClintock. 2012. “Jepson EFlora - Meliaceae”. https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=33069.

18. Question 18

Yes
1
High
In North America, chinaberry seed is dispersed by animals, gravity, and possibly water. Birds and mammals eat chinaberry fruit and disperse its seed. Cattle egrets in Texas use fruitbearing twigs of chinaberry for nesting material, thus dispersing its seed. Seedlings emerge in abundance near the parent plant, suggesting that much of the seed is gravity dispersed. In Hawaii, chinaberry does not appear to have a natural dispersal agent and is thought to be dispersed by humans. In Africa, chinaberry is
dispersed by water and birds (Waggy, 2009).
Waggy, Melissa A. 2009. “Melia Azedarach. In Fire Effects Information System”. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melaze/all.html.

19. Question 19

Yes
1
Medium
In North America, Chinaberrytree seed is dispersed by animals, gravity, and possibly water. In Africa, chinaberry is dispersed by water and birds (Waggy, 2009).
Waggy, Melissa A. 2009. “Melia Azedarach. In Fire Effects Information System”. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melaze/all.html.

20. Question 20

No
0
Very Low
Propagules not likely to disperse as a produce contaminant (PIER, 2004).
“Melia Azedarach: Info from PIER (PIER Species Info)”. 2004. http://hear.its.hawaii.edu/pier/species/melia_azedarach.htm.

Total PRE Score

18
20
70

PRE Score Legend

The PRE Score is calculated by adding the point totals for each (answered) question.

< 13 : Low Potential Risk
13 - 15 : Moderate Potential Risk
> 15 : High Potential Risk

Questions Answered Legend

It is important to answer at least 16 questions to consider a PRE Score as "valid".

≥ 16 : Valid (80% or more questions answered)
≤ 15 : Invalid (not enough questions answered)

Evaluation Credits and Citation


Screener:  Michael Chamberland

 

Below is a recommend citation when referencing this evaluation in other works:

Chamberland, Michael. "Melia azedarach -- Arizona" Plant Risk Evaluator (PRE) published 2022-08-30 https://pretool.org/evaluations/1787

 


Please cite this evaluation. We need your support here!

PRE Evaluations take a long time to research, so please credit this site and evaluation appropriately.


Evaluation Reviewers

reviewed on 2022-12-05
Jutta Burger reviewed on 2022-10-10
Nicole Valentine reviewed on 2022-10-07

 

Associated Project

2022 Western IPM Grant Project

"Expanding Continuity and Capacity in Invasive Plant Risk Assessments across Western States" is a continuation of the successful 2021 project titled "Building Continuity Across State Invasvie Plant Lists: Evaluating Invasive Risk of Horticultural Plants." Both 2021 and 2022's projects are funded by the Western Integrated Pest Management Center. Project partners for this year inclue the California Invasive Plant Council, PlantRight, The University of Arizona, Western Invasive Species Network, Pacific Northwest Invasive Species Council, the Yurok Tribe, and Nevada State Parks. 


 

Associated Organizations, Agencies, and Institutions

The University of Arizona

 

Copyright © 2025 PRETool.org - All rights reserved